This can be supposed to be the "head over to" powder-or darn near it- for nearly any bottle-necked cartridge a single could handload. It is actually the foundation for lots of pet loads, nevertheless I have not been content with the outcomes.
I gave up on it and went to other powder in the event the new powder was building extra stress and was slower compared to aged stuff. I don't recall if I even tried standard h4831 or not; I am pondering not. Click on to expand...
This has become the biggest explanations reloaders are admonished to utilize new data only; and to start small when you have a new great deal of powder. You do not actually know (Unless of course the company lets you know so) that your new number of powder was even created at exactly the same manufacturing unit since the powder to procure a few years back.
We’d like making sure that you’re 18 many years of age or more mature before allowing for you to buy our website. Are you currently eighteen several years of age or older?
The sole big difference as I understand it would be that the SC was built to function by way of powder actions better (which it does). The for a longer period grains will not feed nicely in any way in a few measures. Thats my 02 :grin:
Did you ever try out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I have a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with regular chamber. Asking yourself what to expect with 215 bergers with H4331sc?
Anybody loading 7mm Rem Mag with H4831sc? How are the outcomes, any data you'll be able to share? Should also mention I've some ELD-X a hundred seventy five's I wish to examination out, In case you have data on that too.
The SC or h4831sc SSC selected powders Typically permit for greater load density, so you can normally get a little extra powder in the provided circumstance when working with compressed loads. Use of a fall tube can more increase this edge.
I could stack em in one gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Following months, I received lucky and caught some H1000 on line not to mention paid out somewhat extra. The quite next week in a gun clearly show a guy had an entire circumstance of H1000 for $40 per 1lb. I forget about just h4831 vs h4831sc how much, but Along with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.
In addition, it goes on to state that because of the fshorter grains, that load density could h4831sc be a little bit increased.
So happy your having additional forms of powder back again in. Now you should get primers back in inventory and reloaded can start off reloading once more.. just saying
Following reading through this post (and plenty of Other individuals, but this a person is easily the most data pushed with multiple accredited shooters) I've stopped worrying about touching or remaining within a magical distance with the lands, and began loading where I could enhance numerous elements of a load. Just my .02, ideally you will get one thing to work for ya.
Am i able to think that H4831 may be substituted for H4831sc ? I do know the Actual physical distinction but will it influence the melt away or velocity? I believe not but I'm not 100% sure.
This looks as if a very good location to divulge a bit more info on Hodgdon, H4831 specifically...I once experienced a pound of H4831SC sit about the shelf for numerous several years. It absolutely was obtained right before Hodgdon began publicizing the "Excessive" line of powders, of which the H4831s are an element.